![]() “It’s important to figure out what’s happened in each death. “The bottom line is that you can’t prevent something if you don’t know what causes it,” she said. “But it just further emphasizes what we’ve been seeing over the past couple of decades: We’re not successfully moving the needle on reducing these deaths.”Īnd untangling the specific causes behind all sudden unexpected infant deaths is critical. “In some ways, it was reassuring that the SUID rate didn’t increase,” Parks Brown said. Taiyou Nomachi/Digital Vision/Getty Imagesīabies will continue to die during sleep despite new regulations on sleep products, child advocates fear Still, the latest data emphasizes why continued focus – and better understanding – of the topic is important. While the SIDS rate increased about 15% from 2019 to 2020, the broader SUID rate – which also includes deaths attributed to accidental suffocation and other unknown causes – increased only 3% in that year, an increase that’s not considered statistically significant, the researchers found. And according to the new study, the unexpected increase in SIDS deaths in 2020 is most likely a result of shifting diagnostic criteria. ![]() Individuals responsible for death certification have convened for a couple key meetings in recent years with specific intent to find consistency in the practice. Clark, associate director of epidemiology, evaluation and metrics at the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs, who was not involved in the new study. “The root causes of, and distinction between, SIDS and an unknown cause of death are poorly defined,” said Cheryl L. Experts say there’s been wide variation in how medical examiners and coroners code them, and they’re less distinct than they may seem. The lines between the three classifications within the SUID category are blurry, and the proportions have shifted over the years. ![]() Young children are increasingly victims of opioid epidemic, study finds View of baby's feet with a hospital security tag on Sally Anscombe/Stone RF/Getty Images In 2020, 41% of all sudden unexpected infant deaths were attributed specifically to SIDS, 27% were identified to be accidental suffocation and strangulation in bed, and 31% were classified as an unknown cause.ĭeaths attributed specifically to SIDS jumped between 20, rising from the fourth leading cause of infant mortality to the third.īut this particular trend might highlight just how much we don’t know about these deaths, the new study suggests. ![]() Socioeconomic disparities “not only result in limited access to health care and education, but also in many families not having a stable, safe place for their infants to sleep,” they wrote. In a commentary responding to the research, physicians said that the high rates of sudden unexpected infant deaths in the United States – and growing disparities – “reflect our societal failures.” “But this is something that we’re going to have to continue monitoring.” So, these are very preliminary findings,” Parks Brown said. “We would typically – ideally – look at five years of data in order to see any sort of trend emerging. But in 2020, the rate among Black infants surpassed that of American Indian infants. Sharyn Parks Brown, an epidemiologist with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Division of Reproductive Health and co-author of the study, said the research team reanalyzed the data a couple of times to be sure they were interpreting the findings correctly.įor decades, SUID rates had stayed consistent within each racial and ethnic group and were always highest among American Indian infants. Study identifies potential biomarker for SIDS, but a test for it is a long way off (Photo by LOIC VENANCE / AFP) (Photo credit should read LOIC VENANCE/AFP via Getty Images) LOIC VENANCE/AFP/AFP via Getty Images A mother holds the foot of her newborn baby on Jat the hospital in Nantes, western France.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |